ID: 20231012155318575-1317

Researcher: Hans-Johann Glock, Eva Schmidt

WP: Other

PI: Hans-Johann Glock

Abstract: This paper maintains that objectivism about practical reasons should be combined with pluralism both about the nature of practical reasons and about action explanations. We argue for an ‘expanding circle of practical reasons’, starting out from an open-minded monist objectivism. On this view, practical reasons are not limited to actual facts, but consist in states of affairs, possible facts that may or may not obtain. Going beyond such ‘that-ish’ reasons, we argue that goals are also bona fide practical reasons. This makes for a genuine pluralism about practical reasons. Furthermore, the facts or states of affairs that function as practical reasons are not exclusively natural or descriptive, but include normative facts. That normative facts can be reasons justifies a pluralism about reason explanations, one which allows for what we call enkratic explanations in addition to teleological ones.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2021.1908578

Publication Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2021.1908578

Data Type: null

Data Format: null

Git: None